MIP#19
Vote option:
1) Candidate 1 - Jason Kwok
2) No
Candidate List: Link
Please note: As per MIP#15 (On-Chain MIP#15), COO holds the authority to sign agreements and contracts on behalf of the MVCDAO. This authority is exercised under two specific conditions:
A DAO proposal has been successfully passed.
OR
There is a consensus reached by a majority of committee members, specifically, approval from at least 5 out of the 7 members.
Executive Summary:
Executive Summary:
Welcome to the dawn of a new era with MVC, where we are not just envisioning the future of Bitcoin, but actively shaping it! We are thrilled to announce the formation of the MVC Committee & Various DAO Positions. This is your golden opportunity to be a part of a transformative journey, one that elevates Bitcoin from being merely digital gold to a robust blockchain network that underpins a plethora of web3 decentralized applications.
At MVC, we don't just dream about change, we are the change! MVC represents an irreversible evolution in the Bitcoin ecosystem, and as a DAO, our building process is genuinely decentralized. However, to navigate this exciting journey, we need a dedicated committee and various DAO positions.
Dear MVCers, we invite you to cast your vote for your preferred committee candidate. Remember, every vote counts, and the candidate with the most votes wins. Let's shape the future of MVC together!
Proposal Details:
Candidate Number 1:
Candidate 1: Jason Kwok
Twitter Handle: https://twitter.com/Jason_K0001
Telegram Handle: https://t.me/Jason_K0001
vSpace Holding: 11,000
MetaID:830380
Passport: Provided
KYC: Provided
Agreement to Uphold DAO Rules: Yes, I agree to uphold the DAO rules and follow the proposal rule unconditionally in my application.
Personal Introduction:
"I am Jason.K, a co-founder of MVC, hailing from the vibrant city of Macau. I have been serving as the Initial Temporary COO, a neutral facilitator, ensuring the smooth operation of MVCDAO since February 2023.
I firmly believe that freedom without rules leads to chaos. Rules and principles are the guardrails that keep us on the path of fairness, preventing us from veering into manipulation. Decentralization isn't synonymous with Utopian socialism; it means we all agree to abide by the same set of rules.
If you believe a rule isn't serving its purpose, let's discuss it! We can propose changes through the DAO and create new rules that reflect our evolving needs and challenges. That's the beauty of DAO governance - it's a dynamic entity that grows with us.
Open dialogue is the cornerstone of our collective journey. If you have any questions, feel free to tag me. We encourage public and transparent discussions, addressing all concerns directly. However, please note that while I'm here to assist, our perspectives may not always coincide. It's worth noting that achieving consensus falls under the author's purview, not mine.
Remember, maintaining order requires everyone to adhere to the rules. If someone steps out of line, we need to address it according to the proper procedures and existing rules. If we let violations slide and forgive easily, especially more than once, we risk descending into chaos and creating a loophole where members can easily break rules and return without consequences.
In a thrilling game of football, an impartial referee is needed but needs to be neutral. We should adhere strictly to procedures and rules. We should fine-tune procedures and rules together to minimize personal judgement and dilemmas of an impartial referee."
Proposal Content:
For more details on the initial DAO position formation, please refer to MIP#15. On-Chain Proposal [MIP#15]
To all elected DAO Members, please share your 'Space' address to receive POB rewards. You can submit your address via direct message to the official Twitter account, @mvcglobal (https://twitter.com/mvcglobal).
If there are any adjustments to your receiving address, please inform us no later than the 21st of each month.
Disclaimer & Remarks:
KYC requirement for committee member
As we approach the upcoming elections, we want to reaffirm our unwavering commitment to fostering a culture of trust, transparency, and integrity within our community. A crucial part of this commitment is the KYC verification process, which is instrumental in enhancing the credibility of our elected committee members.
We have observed that some elected committee members may still have unverified passport statuses. To ensure a smooth and transparent election process, we kindly request that you mutually exchange your passport information with Neutral Facilitator before the oath document day.
Your personal information will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and respect for your privacy. We are committed to maintaining a secure and trustworthy environment for all MVCDAO members.
In the event that some members are unable to verify their passport statuses, we will need to initiate a separate DAO proposal to consider exceptions for onboarding specific committee member. We appreciate your understanding and cooperation in this matter.
Thank you for all elected committee member's prompt attention to this matter.
Space is not an investment vehicle:
MVCDAO emphasizes that Space, the native gas of the MVC network, is not intended for investment or speculative purposes. Its value and price are subject to the utility demand within the MVC network, which may lead to price fluctuations. We strongly discourage participants from purchasing Space with the intention of investment or speculation. MVCDAO does not make any commitments or guarantees regarding the price or value of Space. When holding Space, it should be used exclusively for participation in MVCDAO governance or for utility purposes within the MVC network.
Purpose of the proposal:
This proposal is not intended for investment analysis or induction. Instead, it aims to enhance the visibility of the MVC network. It's all about putting our network in the spotlight, not about financial advice.
Conflict of interest declaration:
The author of this proposal has not received any commission.
Heads Up!
MVCDAO and MVClabs can't predict the future. We can't guarantee the outcomes of DAO proposals, including media exposure, events, AMAs, rebranding efforts, and builder programs. We encourage members to do their homework and make informed decisions when voting on proposals.
Community Responsibility:
If a proposal appears questionable, lacks detail, or has escalating costs, members are encouraged to vote 'Against the Proposal' and question its feasibility and cost-effectiveness. Your voice and vote matter!
Committee Accountability:
Committee members are expected to exercise their voting rights with objectivity, diligence, and integrity. They are responsible for evaluating each proposal based on its completeness, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness. If a committee member is found to be compromised, the DAO community or any committee member can raise a proposal to replace or terminate the existing DAO position member. MVCDAO will arrange a replacement within 10 days.
Service Provider Reminder:
Long-term service providers (those engaged for more than 3 months) are required to submit a comprehensive work report every three months. This report must receive either a 60% on-chain approval vote from the DAO or a 70% approval vote from committee members to continue receiving recurrent payments every three months. If this approval is not achieved, a new proposal must be submitted, or the contract will be terminated immediately. This clause is mandatory in all long-term service provider proposals[those engaged for more than 3 months], with the exception of liquidity services.
This clause is mandatory in all long-term service provider proposals, except for liquidity services.
Last updated